Benton v. State
135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 612
This text of 135 So. 920 (Benton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Benton v. State, 135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 612 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
The testimony for the state tends to prove the guilt of the defendant, and hence the affirmative charge was properly refused.
The record has been read and the rulings of the court considered. We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benton-v-state-alactapp-1931.