Benton v. Parish of East Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Benton v. Parish of East Baton Rouge

541 So. 2d 842, 1989 La. LEXIS 1147, 1989 WL 32780

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 7, 1989

DocketNo. 89-CC-0722

StatusPublished

This text of 541 So. 2d 842 (Benton v. Parish of East Baton Rouge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benton v. Parish of East Baton Rouge, 541 So. 2d 842, 1989 La. LEXIS 1147, 1989 WL 32780 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re East Baton Rouge Parish; Baton Rouge, City of; Greater Baton Rouge Park. Auth.; Greater Baton Rouge Con. Sew.Dt., Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 324550; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW89 0416.

Granted. Judgment of the district court denying discovery of recordings and/or transcripts of original recordings requested by relator is vacated and set aside. Relator is entitled to discover “any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action....” L.C.C.P. art. 1422. La.R.S. 15:1301 et seq. and 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2510 et seq. do not apply in this situation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re East Baton Rouge Parish; Baton Rouge, City of; Greater Baton Rouge Park. Auth.; Greater Baton Rouge Con. Sew.Dt., Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 324550; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW89 0416.

Granted. Judgment of the district court denying discovery of recordings and/or transcripts of original recordings requested by relator is vacated and set aside. Relator is entitled to discover “any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action....” L.C.C.P. art. 1422. La.R.S. 15:1301 et seq. and 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2510 et seq. do not apply in this situation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 So. 2d 842, 1989 La. LEXIS 1147, 1989 WL 32780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benton-v-parish-of-east-baton-rouge-la-1989.