Benton & Holden, Inc. v. Central Railroad
196 A. 352, 123 N.J. Eq. 163, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 636
Opinion
The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned vice-chancellor from whose decree the present appeal is taken and we also agree with two findings of law applicable thereto.
The decree will be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benton & Holden, Inc. v. Central Railroad, 196 A. 352, 123 N.J. Eq. 163, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 636 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).
196 A. 352 (Benton & Holden, Inc. v. Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A-117-11 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Intermodal Properties, LLC (070240)
71 A.3d 830 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2013)
Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
23 A.2d 261 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Simandl
1 A.2d 312 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)