Benton County v. Rutherford

30 Ark. 665
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

English, Ch. J.:

Benton county sued Rutherford and wife in the Circuit Court of the county, upon the covenant of seizin in a deed.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, the court sustained the demurrer, and the plaintiff appealed.

There was no final judgment rendered.

On the sustaining of the demurrer, the plaintiff had her election to amend the complaint or to rest, and permit final judgment to be rendered discharging the defendants, and then appeal.

No appeal lies where,there is no final judgment upon demurrer. Hornor, adm’r., v. The State, 27 Ark., 113.

The appeal must be .dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benton County v. Rutherford, 30 Ark. 665 (Ark. 1875).

30 Ark. 665 (Benton County v. Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Southall
661 S.W.2d 383 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)
Arkansas State Board of Architects v. Larsen
291 S.W.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1956)
McWilliams v. Lantz
288 S.W. 381 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
Davis v. Receivers St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
174 S.W. 1196 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Atkins v. Graham
138 S.W. 878 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
Moody v. Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad
103 S.W. 1134 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)