Bento Ortho, Inc. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 51160(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Bento Ortho, Inc. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home (Bento Ortho, Inc. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bento Ortho, Inc. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



Bento Ortho, Inc., as Assignee of Arjona, Suidonia, Appellant,

against

Ameriprise Auto & Home, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, LLP (Nathan M. Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered December 1, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs).

Plaintiff correctly argues that defendant's motion failed to establish that defendant had timely denied plaintiff's claim after plaintiff's assignor had allegedly failed to appear at both an initial and a follow-up EUO. As defendant did not demonstrate that it is not precluded from raising its proffered defense (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Lincoln Gen. Ins. Co., 60 AD3d 1045 [2009]), defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been denied.

Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 12, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westchester Medical Center v. Lincoln General Insurance
60 A.D.3d 1045 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bento Ortho, Inc. v. Ameriprise Auto & Home, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bento-ortho-inc-v-ameriprise-auto-home-nyappterm-2019.