Home/Supreme Court/Bently v. Alaska

Bently v. Alaska

374 U.S. 107
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 10, 1963
Docket648, Misc
StatusPublished

This text of 374 U.S. 107 (Bently v. Alaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bently v. Alaska, 374 U.S. 107 (1963).

Opinion

374 U.S. 107 (1963)

BENTLEY
v.
ALASKA.

No. 648, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA.

Petitioner pro se.

George N. Hayes, Attorney General of Alaska, and John K. Brubaker, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alaska for reconsideration in light of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83, and Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mooney v. Holohan
294 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Bentley v. Alaska
374 U.S. 107 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 U.S. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bently-v-alaska-scotus-1963.