Bentley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

172 P. 1172, 102 Wash. 433, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 945
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1918
DocketNo. 14039
StatusPublished

This text of 172 P. 1172 (Bentley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bentley v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 172 P. 1172, 102 Wash. 433, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 945 (Wash. 1918).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Holcomb, J.

A rehearing En Banc was granted in this case from the decision heretofore made and reported in 98 Wash. 431, 167 Pac. 1127.

The facts at issue and the legal propositions involved are sufficiently stated in the former prevailing opinion and the dissenting opinion {herein, and no amplification is necessary now. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, which the majority of the court now adopt as the correct view of the law and of [434]*434the disposition of the case, the former opinion is overruled and the verdict and judgment affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., Webster, Main, and Parker, JJ., concur.

Fullerton, Mount, and Chadwick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bentley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
167 P. 1127 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 P. 1172, 102 Wash. 433, 1918 Wash. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-western-union-telegraph-co-wash-1918.