Bentley v. Western & Southern Life Insurance

150 S.E.2d 45, 268 N.C. 155, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1148
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The burden was upon the plaintiff to prove that the death of the insured was an event covered by the policy and that she gave to the defendant, within the time specified in the policy, the notice of the alleged injury and the proof of loss required by the policy. Brevard v. Insurance Co., 262 N.C. 458, 137 S.E. 2d 837; Fallins v. Insurance Co., 247 N.C. 72, 100 S.E. 2d 214. The evidence, interpreted in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, together with all inferences in her favor which may reasonably [158]*158be drawn therefrom, is not sufficient to support a verdict to that effect. This would still be true even if Dr. Cannon had been permitted to answer the hypothetical questions propounded to him. It is, therefore, unnecessary to determine whether the objections to those questions were properly sustained. The judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bentley v. Western & Southern Life Insurance, 150 S.E.2d 45, 268 N.C. 155, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1148 (N.C. 1966).

150 S.E.2d 45 (Bentley v. Western & Southern Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance
242 S.E.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)