Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bentley v. State

Bentley v. State

884 So. 2d 302, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12129, 2004 WL 1837890
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bentley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 867 So. 2d 515 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 2004·No. No. 4D04-2893·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bentley appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion which sought additional jail credit. Bentley’s motion is facially insufficient because it does not explain why or how he is entitled to additional credit. Parent v. State, 825 So.2d 514 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

We affirm without prejudice to file a facially sufficient motion.

STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bentley v. State, 884 So. 2d 302, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12129, 2004 WL 1837890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 302 (Bentley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parent v. State
825 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)