Bentley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Bentley v. State

112 So. 810, 22 Ala. App. 101, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 65

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 1927

Docket7 Div. 271.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 112 So. 810 (Bentley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bentley v. State, 112 So. 810, 22 Ala. App. 101, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 65 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The two charges refused by the court and insisted upon as error have been condemned by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160, 87 So. 179.

There was no request for the general charge or motion for a new trial. We cannot therefore pass upon the insistence, made in appellant’s brief, that the defendant was entitled to his discharge on account of the insufficiency of the evidence.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI