Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Bentley v. Pendleton

Bentley v. Pendleton

105 Ohio St. 3d 326
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 4, 2005
DocketNo. 2004-1135
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 Ohio St. 3d 326 (Bentley v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bentley v. Pendleton, 105 Ohio St. 3d 326 (Ohio 2005).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error and for further proceedings not inconsistent with Gilchrist v. Gonsor.

Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A, and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Michael L. Close, and Dale D. Cook; Janik & Dorman, L.L.P., Stacy Lilly, and Matthew Grimm, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bentley v. Pendleton, Unpublished Decision (6-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 3495 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Ohio St. 3d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-pendleton-ohio-2005.