Bentley v. Pendleton

105 Ohio St. 3d 326
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 2005·No. No. 2004-1135·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error and for further proceedings not inconsistent with Gilchrist v. Gonsor.

Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A, and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Michael L. Close, and Dale D. Cook; Janik & Dorman, L.L.P., Stacy Lilly, and Matthew Grimm, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bentley v. Pendleton, 105 Ohio St. 3d 326 (Ohio 2005).

105 Ohio St. 3d 326 (Bentley v. Pendleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bentley v. Pendleton, Unpublished Decision (6-29-2005)
2005 Ohio 3495 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)