Bentley v. Davis & Son

168 S.E. 790, 46 Ga. App. 657, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 163
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 24, 1933
Docket22739
StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 790 (Bentley v. Davis & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bentley v. Davis & Son, 168 S.E. 790, 46 Ga. App. 657, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This was a suit on an open account, brought in the municipal court of Atlanta, and the plantiff obtained a judgment. On an appeal to the appellate division of the court the judgment was affirmed; and, on certiorari to the superior court, the certiorari was overruled. After a careful study of the brief of evidence (consisting of a page and a half only), and the assignments of error in the petition for certiorari, it is our opinion that the overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E. 790, 46 Ga. App. 657, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-davis-son-gactapp-1933.