Bentley v. Commonwealth

392 S.W.2d 67, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 268
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 25, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 392 S.W.2d 67 (Bentley v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bentley v. Commonwealth, 392 S.W.2d 67, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 268 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

MILLIKEN, Judge.

Appellant filed a post conviction motion under RCr 11.42 contending that his con[68]*68viction for obtaining money under false pretenses and issuing cold checks should be vacated on three grounds: (1) That the court was without jurisdiction, (2) that he did not have effective counsel, and (3) that he was forced to plead guilty.

The record shows that the trial court definitely had jurisdiction and that adequate counsel was appointed for him. The trial court did not grant a hearing on the post conviction motion because it found that there was no material issue of fact that could not be determined from the face of the record.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 S.W.2d 67, 1965 Ky. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1965.