Bentley v. Bell
37 S.E. 718, 112 Ga. 464, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 201
This text of 37 S.E. 718 (Bentley v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bentley v. Bell, 37 S.E. 718, 112 Ga. 464, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 201 (Ga. 1900).
Opinion
No error of law was complained, of, and the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict. The trial judge, therefore, did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rhodes & Son Furniture Co. v. Jenkins
58 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 718, 112 Ga. 464, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentley-v-bell-ga-1900.