Bentley v. Bell

37 S.E. 718, 112 Ga. 464, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 201
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 20, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

No error of law was complained, of, and the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict. The trial judge, therefore, did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bentley v. Bell, 37 S.E. 718, 112 Ga. 464, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 201 (Ga. 1900).

37 S.E. 718 (Bentley v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rhodes & Son Furniture Co. v. Jenkins
58 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)