Bentley & Olmstead Co. v. Peck

1917 OK 399, 166 P. 880, 64 Okla. 211, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 626
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 31, 1917·No. 7077·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MILBY, J.

This was an action on a bond given under section 5371,- Rev. Laws 1910, for release of property seized under attachment order issued by a justice of the peace. The plaintiff in error was the obligee on the bond, and the defendants in error the principals and_ sureties thereon. A demurrer was sustained to the petition, and, plaintiff in error declining to amend, judgment was rendered upon the demurrer in favor of defendants in error.

There was no allegation in the petition that upon the execution of the bond the property attached was returned to the person in whose possession it was found. We are of the opinion that for this reason the petition failed to state a cause of action, and that it was not error to sustain the demurrer thereto.’ Drovers’ Live Stock Commission Co. v. Custer Co. State Bank et al., 19 Okla. 302, 91 Pac. 850.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bentley & Olmstead Co. v. Peck, 1917 OK 399, 166 P. 880, 64 Okla. 211, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 626 (Okla. 1917).

1917 OK 399 (Bentley & Olmstead Co. v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calkins v. Ponca City
1923 OK 170 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hallam v. Claggett
1917 OK 407 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)