Bentine v. Talmadge

Utah Supreme Court

Bentine v. Talmadge

493 P.2d 984, 27 Utah 2d 142, 1972 Utah LEXIS 928

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 23, 1972

DocketNo. 12333

StatusPublished

This text of 493 P.2d 984 (Bentine v. Talmadge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bentine v. Talmadge, 493 P.2d 984, 27 Utah 2d 142, 1972 Utah LEXIS 928 (Utah 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on account of electrical work and equipment furnished at defendants’ home. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

On conflicting evidence, the court found a very small sum due plaintiff, in a case [143]*143where the loss of had blood between the parties requires no legal transfusion. We believe that any infection born of this case should be terminal, justifying its demise and decent interment. Though the trial court might have concluded otherwise on believable facts, its decision is bottomed on equally believable facts, which, if believed, attest to its decision, — which we affirm under familiar rules of review.

We concur.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on account of electrical work and equipment furnished at defendants’ home. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

On conflicting evidence, the court found a very small sum due plaintiff, in a case [143]*143where the loss of had blood between the parties requires no legal transfusion. We believe that any infection born of this case should be terminal, justifying its demise and decent interment. Though the trial court might have concluded otherwise on believable facts, its decision is bottomed on equally believable facts, which, if believed, attest to its decision, — which we affirm under familiar rules of review.

We concur.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 P.2d 984, 27 Utah 2d 142, 1972 Utah LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bentine-v-talmadge-utah-1972.