Benthall v. McKay
This text of Benthall v. McKay (Benthall v. McKay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6181
ANTWAN BENTHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCKAY, (First Name Unknown) Mr.; Kitchen Manager,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-01250-TSE-TRJ)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwan Benthall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Antwan Benthall appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Benthall v. McKay, No. 1:08-cv-01250-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va.
filed Dec. 29, 2008, entered Dec. 31, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Benthall v. McKay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benthall-v-mckay-ca4-2009.