Bent v. Bent

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bent v. Bent

529 So. 2d 1273, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2004, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3761, 1988 WL 88517

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 1988

DocketNo. 87-931

StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 1273 (Bent v. Bent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bent v. Bent, 529 So. 2d 1273, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2004, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3761, 1988 WL 88517 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant wife challenges the trial court’s order of February 27, 1987, specifying the visitation rights of the parties in respect to their minor children.

The only meritorious point appellant raises is that the trial court vacated certain restrictions previously imposed by an order of the court entered August 7, 1985. The vacation of that order was beyond the issues before the court.

[1274]*1274Accordingly, we direct the trial court to enter an amended order deleting the provision of its order which states: “3. The restrictions on the husband’s visitation heretofore ordered by the Honorable E. Randolph Bentley, be and are hereby set aside and held for naught.” Our opinion should not be interpreted to preclude appel-lee husband from challenging those restrictions.

Otherwise, we affirm.

FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI