Bent v. Andersen Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Bent v. Andersen Corp.

650 N.E.2d 1316, 85 N.Y.2d 901, 627 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1354

DecidedMarch 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 650 N.E.2d 1316 (Bent v. Andersen Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bent v. Andersen Corp., 650 N.E.2d 1316, 85 N.Y.2d 901, 627 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1354 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiff’s postjudgment motion to set aside the jury verdict, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiff’s postjudgment motion to set aside the jury verdict, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 N.E.2d 1316, 85 N.Y.2d 901, 627 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bent-v-andersen-corp-ny-1995.