Benstone v. Cherry

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Benstone v. Cherry. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 F. App'x 267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 11-6046·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6046

MAHMOUD A. BENSTONE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00313-JCC-JFA)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mahmoud A. Benstone, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mahmoud A. Benstone appeals the district court’s order

awarding summary judgment to Roy W. Cherry in this 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Benstone v. Cherry, No. 1:10-cv-00313-

JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 22, 2010 & entered Dec. 23, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benstone v. Cherry, (4th Cir. 2011).

Benstone v. Cherry (Benstone v. Cherry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related