Benson v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Benson v. United States

169 F. 31, 94 C.C.A. 399, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 1909

DocketNo. 1,562

StatusPublished

This text of 169 F. 31 (Benson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benson v. United States, 169 F. 31, 94 C.C.A. 399, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546 (9th Cir. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was indicted in the court below with Edward B. Perrin for a conspiracy to defraud the United States.

This case was heard upon objections to the indictment upon the record filed by his codefendant, Edward B. Perrin, No. 1,541. The only question raised in this case is the sufficiency of the indictment.

We held in the Perrin Case (just decided) 169 Fed. 17, that the indictment is sufficient; and upon the law of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was indicted in the court below with Edward B. Perrin for a conspiracy to defraud the United States.

This case was heard upon objections to the indictment upon the record filed by his codefendant, Edward B. Perrin, No. 1,541. The only question raised in this case is the sufficiency of the indictment.

We held in the Perrin Case (just decided) 169 Fed. 17, that the indictment is sufficient; and upon the law of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 F. 31, 94 C.C.A. 399, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-united-states-ca9-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack