Benson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benson v. Selsky

50 A.D.3d 1347, 854 N.Y.S.2d 824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 50 A.D.3d 1347 (Benson v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benson v. Selsky, 50 A.D.3d 1347, 854 N.Y.S.2d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, engaging in violent conduct, assaulting an inmate, fighting, possessing a weapon and refusing a direct order. We now confirm.

The misbehavior report, as amplified by hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it, relates that petitioner went after another inmate with a mop stick and then, ignoring numerous orders from the officer to stop, proceeded to exchange punches with the inmate. The foregoing constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Chavis v Goord, 45 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]). To the extent that petitioner offered exculpatory statements, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Vigliotti v Selsky, 45 AD3d 946, 946-947 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied an impartial hearing, have been considered and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of creating a disturbance, engaging in violent conduct, assaulting an inmate, fighting, possessing a weapon and refusing a direct order. We now confirm.

The misbehavior report, as amplified by hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it, relates that petitioner went after another inmate with a mop stick and then, ignoring numerous orders from the officer to stop, proceeded to exchange punches with the inmate. The foregoing constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Chavis v Goord, 45 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]). To the extent that petitioner offered exculpatory statements, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Vigliotti v Selsky, 45 AD3d 946, 946-947 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied an impartial hearing, have been considered and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.3d 1347, 854 N.Y.S.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack