Benson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedDecember 26, 2019
Docket2:19-cv-01949
StatusUnknown

This text of Benson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (Benson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, (D. Nev. 2019).

Opinion

1 | IMARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931 MCLETCHIE LAW 2| 1701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300; Fax: (702) 425-8220 4 | |Email: maggie @nvlitigation.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Mary Benson 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 MARY BENSON, an individual, Case. No.: 2:19-cv-01949-RFB-VCF 9 Plaintiff, STIPULATED 10 Vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 12 DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity; and, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official 13|| capacity as Sheriff of the Las Vegas 14 Metropolitan Police Department; 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff MARY BENSON and Defendants LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN 17 | POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOSEPH LOMBARDO (“LVMPD Defendants”), by their 18 | {respective counsel, having agreed to the following and for good cause under Rule 26(c)(1) 19 | of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. 2] Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of 99 | |confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 | |disclosure may be warranted under Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 74 | |The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 25 | |or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends to only the limited 26 | |information or items that are entitled under law to treatment as confidential. 97 | \/// 9g | |///

I 2. SCOPE. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery 4 requests, and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be 4 subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to this 5 stipulated protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. A copy of 6 this Order must be included with any subpoena to any third party. Any party, or any third 7 party who produces documents in this litigation, may designate documents as 3 “CONFIDENTIAL,” but only after review of the documents by an attorney who has, in good 9 faith, determined that the documents contain “Confidential Information,” as defined below, 10 and pursuant to the procedure set forth below. 11 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 2 “Confidential Information” shall mean information meriting special protection 13 under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable case law. Confidential Information 14 does not include information that (a) is in the public domain at the time of disclosure; (b) 15 becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; (c) the Receiving 16 Party can show was in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of disclosure; or (d) the 7 Receiving Party lawfully receives from a Non-party later without restriction as to disclosure. 18 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS. 19 Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, agents, and 29 | |attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, paralegals, and 31 | |support/ clerical staff). 2 Non-party: Any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity 23 | jother than a party. 4 Protected Material: Any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information 25 | |that is designated by a Party or Non-Party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving Party 26 | |challenges the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is not 97 | jentitled to protection as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court for an 2g | |order designating the material confidential within the time period specified below; or (c) the

1 | |Designating Party withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing. 2 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in this 3 | Jaction. 4 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 5 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates Discovery Material as 6 | |“CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected 7 | |Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. 8 Challenging Party: A party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s 9 | |confidentiality designation. 10 Confidentiality Log: A Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 11 | |documents designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” that includes the Bates numbers of the 12 | |documents designated (or the portions thereof) as “Confidential” and the basis for doing so. 13 | |Each Producing Party shall keep this log cumulatively and re-produce it every time they 14 | |designate something as “CONFIDENTIAL” so that it is a cumulative record of what the 15 | |party has marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. 17 Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or 18 affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere lwith the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the 20 | |“Confidential” designation. A Confidentiality Log must accompany any production of 21 | |Protected Material that includes the Bates numbers of the documents designated (or portions 22 | Ithereof) as “CONFIDENTIAL” and the basis for doing so. Documents designated as 23 | |CONFIDENTIAL by the Producing Party shall be designated “CONFIDENTIAL” prior to, 24 | lor contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the documents. 25 A Party other than the Producing Party can designate material produced by a 26 Producing Party but not designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” as “CONFIDENTIAL” via letter 27 | |to the Producing Party and any Receiving Parties. Such designation shall have the same force 28

1 | Jas an initial designation by the Producing Party. 2 Any designation of documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be accompanied with 3 | |a Confidentiality Log in the form included at Exhibit A. 4 A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit 5 | |CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the 6 | |appropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate 7 | |for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that 8 | |qualify—so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for 9 | |which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 10 | |If only a portion or portions of materials on a page or within a document merit protection, a 11 | |Producing Party must so indicate by making appropriate markings in the margins but not 12 | Jover text. The accompanying log should clearly explain which portion is designated as 13 | |CONFIDENTIAL. 14 A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for 15 | |inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 16 | |indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before 17 | |the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed 18 | |“Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and 19 | |produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify 20 | |for protection under this Order, and, before producing the specified documents, the 21 | |Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected 22 | |Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael Clifton Chase
18 F.3d 1166 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Benson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-las-vegas-metropolitan-police-department-nvd-2019.