Benson v. Gutterman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Benson v. Gutterman

33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 89

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 753 (Benson v. Gutterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benson v. Gutterman, 33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 89 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By the return in this case the trial justice certifies that he rendered judgment on March 8, 1900, which was within eight days after the submission of the case. The presence [754]*754of certain unauthenticated words under the justice’s signature on the judgment should not warrant us in indulging in inferences to the contrary. This being the only point raised, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebioh and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By the return in this case the trial justice certifies that he rendered judgment on March 8, 1900, which was within eight days after the submission of the case. The presence [754]*754of certain unauthenticated words under the justice’s signature on the judgment should not warrant us in indulging in inferences to the contrary. This being the only point raised, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegebioh and O’Gobman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-gutterman-nyappterm-1900.