Benson v. Clark
This text of 1 Cow. 258 (Benson v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Both these acts were irregular. The Justice had no right to have any intercourse with the jury, without consent of the parties; and though he states, that he did not answer their questions, the practice may lead to great abuse, if tolerated. The observations of the Court in Taylor v. Betsford, (13 John. 487) are strictly applicable. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider the other errors assigned.
Judgment reversed...
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cow. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-clark-nysupct-1823.