Benson v. Benson

528 U.S. 1183, 120 S. Ct. 1226, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1125, 68 U.S.L.W. 3535
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 22, 2000·No. No. 98-1903; No. 98-7256; No. 98-9269; No. 98-9523; No. 98-10042; No. 99-151; No. 99-575; No. 99-634; No. 99-661; No. 99-716; No. 99-911; No. 99-5212; No. 99-5652; No. 99-5859; No. 99-5962; No. 99-6028; No. 99-6145; No. 99-6266; No. 99-6275; No. 99-6308; No. 99-6344; No. 99-6406; No. 99-6419; No. 99-6479; No. 99-6502; No. 99-6535; No. 99-6538; No. 99-6551; No. 99-6607; No. 99-6700; No. 99-6800; No. 99-6866; No. 99-6888; No. 99-6916; No. 99-6961; No. 99-7023; No. 99-7362·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1183]*1183ante, p. 816;

525 U. S. 1138;

ante, p. 830;

ante, p. 838;

ante, p. 867;

ante, p. 875;

ante, p. 1046;

ante, p. 1062;

ante, p. 1062;

ante, p. 1047;

ante, p. 1081;

ante, p. 892;

ante, p. 936;

ante, p. 940;

[1184]*1184No. 99-5962. No. 99-6028. No. 99-6145. No. 99-6266. No. 99-6275. No. 99-6308. No. 99-6344. No. 99-6406. No. 99-6419. No. 99-6479. No. 99-6502. No. 99-6535. No. 99-6538. No. 99-6551. No. 99-6607. No. 99-6700. No. 99-6800. No. 99-6866. No. 99-6888. No. 99-6916. No. 99-6961. No. 99-7023. No. 99-7362.

ante, p. 972;

ante, p. 973;

ante, p. 1007;

ante, p. 1024;

ante, p. 1018;

ante, p. 1025;

ante, p. 988;

ante, p. 1026;

ante, p. 1049;

ante, p. 1051;

ante, p. 1051;

ante, p. 1027;

ante, p. 1064;

ante, p. 1027;

ante, p. 1052;

ante, p. 1052;

ante, p. 1053;

ante, p. 1065;

ante, p. 1089;

ante, p. 1017;

ante, p. 1090;

ante, p. 1073; and

ante, p. 1073. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benson v. Benson, 528 U.S. 1183, 120 S. Ct. 1226, 145 L. Ed. 2d 1125, 68 U.S.L.W. 3535 (2000).

528 U.S. 1183 (Benson v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disability Advocates, Inc. v. McMahon
279 F. Supp. 2d 158 (N.D. New York, 2003)
Leland v. Moran
235 F. Supp. 2d 153 (N.D. New York, 2002)