Benson v. Benson

811 So. 2d 861, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088, 2002 WL 463604
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Benson v. Benson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2002·No. No. 5D01-116·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Following an appeal of this cause, this court reversed the final judgment of dissolution and remanded to the trial court to list and evaluate the marital assets and to reconsider the marital distribution, if appropriate, after preparing such list and making such evaluation. The court was also to reconsider alimony and/or attorney’s fees as a part of its overall evaluation. The trial court has made a good faith effort to comply with our direction but has come up short. We believe it would be in the best interest of justice that the matter be reassigned for further consideration. The new judge may, if he or she elects, hold additional hearings.

We remand to the Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit to reassign this cause and direct compliance with our original mandate.

MOTION TO ENFORCE GRANTED.

SHARP, W„ HARRIS, JJ., and LAMBERT, B., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benson v. Benson, 811 So. 2d 861, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4088, 2002 WL 463604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

811 So. 2d 861 (Benson v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.