Benson v. Behrman
This text of 248 A.D.2d 153 (Benson v. Behrman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered November 20, 1996, upon a jury verdict, dismissing the complaint as against defendant Dr. Stanley Behrman, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this personal injury action, the trial court properly Allowed the use of a medical text to impeach the credibility of [154]*154plaintiffs expert witness, who had previously acknowledged the text as authoritative (see, Spiegel v Levy, 201 AD2d 378, Iv denied 83 NY2d 758; Hastings v Chrysler Corp., 273 App Div 292, 294).
The court was also correct in restraining plaintiffs counsel from straying outside the four corners of the evidence and offering his own speculation on summation with respect to a plaster model of plaintiffs teeth made before, not after, the operation at issue (see, Johnston v Colvin, 145 AD2d 846, 848).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 153, 670 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-v-behrman-nyappdiv-1998.