Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh

40 A.D.2d 592, 335 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3950
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 1, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The cross motion to dismiss the purported appeal by interveners is granted because they have no standing, since they were not parties to the original proceeding and permission to intervene was given after the time to appeal had expired. The motion for a stay of enforcement of the order of Justice Eino, entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on or about June 3, 1972, granting interim base rent orders and the motion by Robert Abrams, President of the Borough of Bronx, requesting leave to intervene or alternatively to file a brief amicus curiae, are denied as moot and academic. The stay, dated August 29, 1972, affixed to the notice of motion, is vacated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, McNally, Steuer, and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh, 40 A.D.2d 592, 335 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

40 A.D.2d 592 (Benson Realty Corp. v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Auerbach v. Bennett
393 N.E.2d 994 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
City of Amsterdam v. New York State Department of Transportation
64 A.D.2d 946 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)