Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedAugust 8, 2019

Docket79171

StatusPublished

This text of Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREDRICK J. BENSON, JR., No. 79171 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, FILED Respondent, and AUG 0 ß 019 THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIZABETH A. DROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Real Party in Interest. By C DEPUTRK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to reconsider petitioner's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to • understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME Couar OF NEVADA

(0) I947A ORO. 0 33 %Li tc:

:41(4i 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

,LtfreitA Pickering Hardesty

cc: Fredrick J. Benson, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 4WD

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREDRICK J. BENSON, JR., No. 79171 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, FILED Respondent, and AUG 0 ß 019 THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIZABETH A. DROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Real Party in Interest. By C DEPUTRK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to reconsider petitioner's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to • understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME Couar OF NEVADA

(0) I947A ORO. 0 33 %Li tc:

:41(4i 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioned ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

,LtfreitA Pickering Hardesty

cc: Fredrick J. Benson, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 4WD

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Benson (Fredrick) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benson-fredrick-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack