Benskin v. Benskin
734 S.W.2d 314, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4550
Opinion
ORDER
Dissolution case. Husband appeals. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Benskin v. Benskin, 734 S.W.2d 314, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4550 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).
734 S.W.2d 314 (Benskin v. Benskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.