Benpensata v. Brophy

269 A.D. 962, 58 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4764

This text of 269 A.D. 962 (Benpensata v. Brophy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benpensata v. Brophy, 269 A.D. 962, 58 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (See Downey v. Hale, 67 F. 2d 208, and People v. Nitzberg, 289 N. Y. 523, 530.) All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and' remands relator into custody.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nitzberg
47 N.E.2d 37 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Downey v. Hale
67 F.2d 208 (First Circuit, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 962, 58 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benpensata-v-brophy-nyappdiv-1945.