Benov v. Presbyterian Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Benov v. Presbyterian Hospital

26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 778 (Benov v. Presbyterian Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Benov v. Presbyterian Hospital, 26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered November 16, 1965,, reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise .of [779]*779discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff Ruth Benov and plaintiff Paul Benov stipulate to accept, in lieu of the award by verdict, respectively, $20,000 and $2,500, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified, affirmed, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. In this action to recover for personal injuries it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive and is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered November 16, 1965,, reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise .of [779]*779discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, unless plaintiff Ruth Benov and plaintiff Paul Benov stipulate to accept, in lieu of the award by verdict, respectively, $20,000 and $2,500, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as so modified, affirmed, with costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant. In this action to recover for personal injuries it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive and is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 778, 273 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benov-v-presbyterian-hospital-nyappdiv-1966.