Home/Oregon Supreme Court/Benoit v. Kroger

Benoit v. Kroger

228 P.3d 1214, 348 Or. 116
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 25, 2010
DocketS058242
StatusPublished

This text of 228 P.3d 1214 (Benoit v. Kroger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Benoit v. Kroger, 228 P.3d 1214, 348 Or. 116 (Or. 2010).

Opinion

228 P.3d 1214 (2010)
348 Or. 116

BENOIT
v.
KROGER.

(S058242).

Supreme Court of Oregon.

March 25, 2010.

Miscellaneous Supreme Court Disposition.

Ballot Titles Certified.

Petitioner's argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 72 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.0.35(2) to (6) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 250.0.35
Oregon § 250.0.35

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 P.3d 1214, 348 Or. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benoit-v-kroger-or-2010.