Benny and Kerrick Horton D/B/A K & B Properties v. Ashley Smith
This text of Benny and Kerrick Horton D/B/A K & B Properties v. Ashley Smith (Benny and Kerrick Horton D/B/A K & B Properties v. Ashley Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00155-CV
BENNY AND KERRICK HORTON D/B/A K & B PROPERTIES, APPELLANTS
V.
ASHLEY SMITH, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 223rd District Court Gray County, Texas Trial Court No. 41049, Honorable Phil N. Vanderpool, Presiding
August 13, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellants, Benny and Kerrick Horton d/b/a K & B Properties, appeal from the trial
court’s Order Granting Defendant’s Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss. Now pending before
this Court is Appellants and Appellee’s “Agreed Motion to Remand to Trial Court.” The
motion is granted. Pursuant to the motion, we set aside the Order Granting Defendant’s
Rule 91(a) Motion to Dismiss without regard to the merits, remand the case to the trial
court for further proceedings, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). As requested by the parties, costs shall be taxed against the parties who incurred them. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Benny and Kerrick Horton D/B/A K & B Properties v. Ashley Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/benny-and-kerrick-horton-dba-k-b-properties-v-ashley-smith-texapp-2024.