Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Bennrona Corp. v. Mulroney

Bennrona Corp. v. Mulroney

254 A.D. 630, 3 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6777
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 9, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 630 (Bennrona Corp. v. Mulroney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennrona Corp. v. Mulroney, 254 A.D. 630, 3 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Proof of ownership of the plaintiff’s car was sufficient to establish prima facie that the person operating the car was engaged in the owner’s service. (Ferris v. Sterling, 214 N. Y. 249.) We find nothing in the record to rebut this presumption. The contributory negligence of the driver of the car as found by the jury barred a recovery. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Zimmer
31 Misc. 2d 661 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Schleede v. State
5 Misc. 2d 785 (New York State Court of Claims, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 630, 3 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennrona-corp-v-mulroney-nyappdiv-1938.