Bennie Paul Rangel v. State
This text of Bennie Paul Rangel v. State (Bennie Paul Rangel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-07-00231-CR
Bennie Paul Rangel, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 06-819-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was due November 5, 2007. Appellant’s retained attorney, David
Aaron Pina, did not respond to the Court’s notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether
appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent,
whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall
make appropriate findings and recommendations. A record from this hearing, including copies of
all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the
clerk of the Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than February 29, 2008. Tex. R. App.
P. 38.8(b)(3). __________________________________________
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Abated
Filed: January 29, 2008
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bennie Paul Rangel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennie-paul-rangel-v-state-texapp-2008.