Bennetti v. City of New York

577 N.E.2d 1043, 78 N.Y.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 831
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 11, 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 577 N.E.2d 1043 (Bennetti v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennetti v. City of New York, 577 N.E.2d 1043, 78 N.Y.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 831 (N.Y. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners, approximately 225 New York City firefighters hired after July 1, 1988, commenced this article 78 proceeding challenging respondents’ implementation of a decision of an impasse panel which had been appointed to settle a collective bargaining dispute between petitioners’ union and the City of New York. Specifically, petitioners argued that since section 15-107 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York established a salary grade structure whereby newly hired firefighters would reach top pay grade after three years of service, respondents lacked the power to implement that part of the impasse panel’s decision which increased that period to five years, without first having section 15-107 amended. We conclude that the courts below properly rejected this contention.

Although petitioners concede that statutory provisions such as section 15-107 may, as a general matter, be freely waived by the parties to a collective bargaining agreement (see, Schacht v City of New York, 39 NY2d 28, 32; Matter of Wiener v Board of Educ., 90 AD2d 832, 833; Antinore v State of New York, 49 AD2d 6, 10, affd 40 NY2d 921), they nevertheless [897]*897contend that section 12-311 (c) (3) (e) of the code requires that legislative "approval” be obtained before an impasse panel decision purporting to override such a provision may be implemented. We cannot agree.

A comparison of section 12-311 (c) (3) (e) with section 201 (12) of the Civil Service Law clearly demonstrates that the former was merely designed to ensure that legislative "approval” of an impasse panel decision would be required if such "approval” would have been necessary had a negotiated collective bargaining agreement been involved (compare, Administrative Code § 12-311 [c] [3] [e]1 [applicable to impasse panel decisions], with Civil Service Law § 201 [12]2 [applicable to negotiated collective bargaining agreements]). Accordingly, since petitioners concede that legislative "approval” would not have been required had the salary grade structure set forth in section 15-107 been modified through a negotiated collective bargaining agreement, their contention that section 12-311 (c) (3) (e) nevertheless mandates that such "approval” should have been obtained here, must be rejected.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Kaye taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Wiener v. Bd. of Educ. of the East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist.
90 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Antinore v. State of New York
358 N.E.2d 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Schacht v. City of New York
346 N.E.2d 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Antinore v. State
49 A.D.2d 6 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 N.E.2d 1043, 78 N.Y.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1991 N.Y. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennetti-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1991.