Bennett v. Wright

New York Supreme Court

Bennett v. Wright

28 N.Y.S. 453, 77 Hun 331, 84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 63

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedApril 13, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 N.Y.S. 453 (Bennett v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Wright, 28 N.Y.S. 453, 77 Hun 331, 84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 63 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The mortgagee having the right, under the power of sale, to foreclose his mortgages without action, their validity can be contested only by an action to have it adjudged that they were null and void, or that they have been paid, as the case may be. The mortgagee can ask to have the mortgages foreclosed in this action, and on such an issue might have an injunction restraining the plaintiff from removing the property from the state, or from dispersing it, to the injury of the mortgagee’s interests. We think, under the allegations, that the mortgagee should be restrained from enforcing the power of sale pending this action, upon condition the plaintiff should be required to give an undertaking, in lieu of those heretofore given, in the sum of $2,000. No costs to either party. Order modified accordingly, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The mortgagee having the right, under the power of sale, to foreclose his mortgages without action, their validity can be contested only by an action to have it adjudged that they were null and void, or that they have been paid, as the case may be. The mortgagee can ask to have the mortgages foreclosed in this action, and on such an issue might have an injunction restraining the plaintiff from removing the property from the state, or from dispersing it, to the injury of the mortgagee’s interests. We think, under the allegations, that the mortgagee should be restrained from enforcing the power of sale pending this action, upon condition the plaintiff should be required to give an undertaking, in lieu of those heretofore given, in the sum of $2,000. No costs to either party. Order modified accordingly, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.Y.S. 453, 77 Hun 331, 84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 60 N.Y. St. Rep. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-wright-nysupct-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack