Bennett v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Bennett v. United States

267 F. App'x 212

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 F. App'x 716 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2008·No. No. 07-1833·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James R. Bennett appeals from the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of the United States in his action in which he asserted the improper assessment and collection of income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bennett v. United States, No. 6:06-cv-00017-nkm, 2007 WL 1976741 (W.D.Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James R. Bennett appeals from the district court’s order entering judgment in favor of the United States in his action in which he asserted the improper assessment and collection of income taxes. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bennett v. United States, No. 6:06-cv-00017-nkm, 2007 WL 1976741 (W.D.Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bennett v. United States, 267 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 212 (Bennett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.