Bennett v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Bennett v. Taylor

18 Ind. 258

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ind. 258 (Bennett v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Taylor, 18 Ind. 258 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff, sued the appellants, upon a promissory note for the payment of 325 dollars. Process having been duly served on the defendants below, they were duly called, and defaulted, and judgment accordingly entered against them. Uo motion to set aside the default appears to have been made in the Common Pleas; nor does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken to the rulings of that Court. The cause is, therefore, not properly before this Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per 'cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff, sued the appellants, upon a promissory note for the payment of 325 dollars. Process having been duly served on the defendants below, they were duly called, and defaulted, and judgment accordingly entered against them. Uo motion to set aside the default appears to have been made in the Common Pleas; nor does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken to the rulings of that Court. The cause is, therefore, not properly before this Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per 'cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-taylor-ind-1862.