Bennett v. Supreme Enforcement Corp.

250 A.D. 265, 293 N.Y.S. 870, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8320
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1937·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The action is brought by the Attorney-General of the State of New York upon the relation of the New York County Lawyers’ Association, pursuant to sections 1221-a and 1221-b of the Civil Practice Act, to secure an injunction to restrain the alleged violation by the defendant of the provisions of section 280 of the Penal Law.

We deem the taking by the defendant corporation of assignments for the purpose of bringing suit upon claims which prove otherwise uncollectible, to be a violation of the statute, as amended [266]*266by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1934, even though there was no solicitation.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and judgment directed in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint, with costs.

Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley and Dore, JJ., concur; Cohn, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. Supreme Enforcement Corp., 250 A.D. 265, 293 N.Y.S. 870, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 265 (Bennett v. Supreme Enforcement Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bluebird Partners v. First Fidelity Bank, N. A.
731 N.E.2d 581 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
69 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
R. S. Stokvis & Sons, Inc. v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.
58 F. Supp. 260 (S.D. New York, 1944)
In re New York County Lawyers Ass'n
178 Misc. 907 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Gellens v. 11 West 42nd Street, Inc.
259 A.D. 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Frank H. Zindle, Inc. v. Friedman's Express, Inc.
258 A.D. 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)