Bennett v. Sturgis

150 So. 2d 52, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1336
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 7, 1963
DocketNos. 9874, 9875
StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 2d 52 (Bennett v. Sturgis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. Sturgis, 150 So. 2d 52, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1336 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

These suits were consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. The first action is in tort by plaintiffs, husband and wife, seeking recovery for personal injuries and property damages from the defendants, and the second action is a compensation claim by the plaintiff against his employer and its insurer. From judgment in each case rejecting plaintiffs’ demands, they perfected devolutive appeals to this Court.

The appellants in these cases neither appeared nor filed briefs prior to the date fixed for submission of their appeals, and, accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the Court, ex pro-prio motu, that these appeals be and they are dismissed at appellants’ cost. (Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Section 4(b), 8 LSA-R.S.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 2d 52, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-sturgis-lactapp-1963.