Bennett v. Stonewall Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bennett v. Stonewall Insurance Co.

348 So. 2d 680, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1869

StatusPublished

This text of 348 So. 2d 680 (Bennett v. Stonewall Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. Stonewall Insurance Co., 348 So. 2d 680, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a personal injury action appeals an order of equitable distribution entered pursuant to Section 627.736(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). The burden of appellant’s argument is that the trial court was too liberal with the insurance company and thereby abused its discretion. Our review of the record indicates that the trial court earnestly endeavored to follow the directions of the Supreme Court of Florida as set out in Williams v. Gateway Insurance Company, 331 So.2d 301 (Fla.1976). See also Stonewall Insurance Company v. Valbuena, 344 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). No misapplication of the law or abuse of discretion appearing on this record, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in a personal injury action appeals an order of equitable distribution entered pursuant to Section 627.736(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). The burden of appellant’s argument is that the trial court was too liberal with the insurance company and thereby abused its discretion. Our review of the record indicates that the trial court earnestly endeavored to follow the directions of the Supreme Court of Florida as set out in Williams v. Gateway Insurance Company, 331 So.2d 301 (Fla.1976). See also Stonewall Insurance Company v. Valbuena, 344 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). No misapplication of the law or abuse of discretion appearing on this record, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 So. 2d 680, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-stonewall-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack