Bennett v. State
This text of 492 S.W.2d 482 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of rape. The court assessed punishment at thirty years.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief in which he concludes the present appeal is frivolous. Further, the record reflects that appellant has been served with a copy of appellant’s brief. No pro se brief has been filed. The procedure is in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the procedure in this State. We have examined the record and agree that the appeal is wholly without merit.
No reversible error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 S.W.2d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.