Bennett v. State

295 S.W.2d 217, 163 Tex. Crim. 638, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1199
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 27, 1956·No. No. 28,383·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the sale of whisky in a wet area without a permit, the punishment being assessed at ten days in jail.

The information, as it appears in the transcript in this case, does not allege the date the offense is alleged to have been committed.

“The indictment, information and complaint, or the complaint when the prosecution is based alone upon a complaint, to be sufficient, must give the day, month, and year of the commission of the offense.” Branch’s P. C., Sec. 432.

The information, here, is fatally defective because it fails to reflect the date of the offense.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bennett v. State, 295 S.W.2d 217, 163 Tex. Crim. 638, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1199 (Tex. 1956).

295 S.W.2d 217 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte McFarland
632 S.W.2d 621 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1982)