Bennett v. State

31 Tex. 303
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1868
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Tex. 303 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. State, 31 Tex. 303 (Tex. 1868).

Opinion

Lindsay, J.

—Where there are two counts or charges in an indictment, embracing two different offenses of the same class and the same degree, and there is a verdict of “guilty” found by the jury, they can only assess one penalty against the accused. If two offenses be charged in the indictment, of the same class, but of different degrees, the party accused may make his election upon which he will be tried. Failing to do so, the jury may assess the penalty for either offense, if the evidence in the cause [304]*304warrant the conviction upon either. This may be regarded as one of the improvements of the code of criminal procedure upon the common-law methods of trial for penal offenses. There is no error in the judgment which needs correction, and it is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Tex. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-tex-1868.