Bennett v. State

1936 OK CR 120, 63 P.2d 771, 60 Okla. Crim. 165, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 16, 1936
DocketNo. A-9106.
StatusPublished

This text of 1936 OK CR 120 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bennett v. State, 1936 OK CR 120, 63 P.2d 771, 60 Okla. Crim. 165, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail.

*166 A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 7th day of April, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1936 OK CR 120, 63 P.2d 771, 60 Okla. Crim. 165, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-oklacrimapp-1936.