Bennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bennett v. State

1936 OK CR 120, 63 P.2d 771, 60 Okla. Crim. 165, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 16, 1936·No. No. A-9106.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail.

*166 A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 7th day of April, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and her punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and 30 days’ confinement in the county jail.

*166 A copy of the record and case-made was filed in this court on the 7th day of April, 1936. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The case is therefore affirmed.

Bennett v. State, 1936 OK CR 120, 63 P.2d 771, 60 Okla. Crim. 165, 1936 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113 (Okla. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

1936 OK CR 120 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.