Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bennett v. State

103 S.E. 858, 25 Ga. App. 504, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 38

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 10, 1920

Docket11533

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 858 (Bennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bennett v. State, 103 S.E. 858, 25 Ga. App. 504, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 38 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinions

Bloodworth, J.

“ In this case the motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. There was some slight evidence authorizing the verdict; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court a reviewing court is [506]*506powerless to interfere. When the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, the trial judge has a wide discretion as to granting or refusing a new trial; but whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

“ In this case the motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. There was some slight evidence authorizing the verdict; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court a reviewing court is [506]*506powerless to interfere. When the verdict is apparently decidedly against the weight of the evidence, the trial judge has a wide discretion as to granting or refusing a new trial; but whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 858, 25 Ga. App. 504, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bennett-v-state-gactapp-1920.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack