Bennett v. State
153 So. 3d 968, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20929, 2014 WL 7404078
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bennett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7284 →
Opinion
Jarmeel Bennett challenges his convictions and sentences for burglary with a firearm while concealing his identity with a hood or mask and attempted robbery with a firearm while concealing his identity with a hood or mask. We affirm without prejudice to Bennett’s raising his claims of ineffectiveness of trial counsel as set forth in the instant appeal in a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Derisma v. State, 14 So.3d 262, 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bennett v. State, 153 So. 3d 968, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20929, 2014 WL 7404078 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
153 So. 3d 968 (Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DERISMA v. State
14 So. 3d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)